Skip to content

A hidden cause of stroke?

February 25, 2013

Every day of placement brings with it something new to look up and learn about. I already wrote about all the respiratory knowledge that I’ve gained while being on placement in an acute centre  but something else that I’ve been learning more about is that some of the patients we see for swallowing issues caused by stroke had their strokes in a setting I never would have expected: their chiropractor’s office.

What might be going on? It’s been suggested that either underlying, pre-existing conditions can be exacerbated to the point where a stroke occurs because of neck manipulations, or that stretching of the main vertebral arteries that run up the side of the neck can cause disintegration/damage, resulting in blockages to blood flow to the brain.(1)

Whether or not the types of neck manipulations done by chiropractors can cause  stroke is a highly contentious issue. On one hand, some research exists to suggest that spinal manipulation therapy is unlikely to mechanically disrupt the vertebral arteries (2) and that a stroke caused as a result of manipulation is a very rare event. On the other hand, there have been neurologists advocating for a ban on neck manipulations. In 2002, 62 Canadian neurologists, in association with the Canadian Stroke Consortium issued a warning to the public, saying “the  neurological damage that can result subsequent to upper neck manipulation can be debilitating and fatal” (3) and especially warn against these kinds of manipulations being done on children.

The statement went on to point out that there may not even really be any benefit to getting neck manipulations done, and that there is little scientific evidence to support this practise, especially in the face of the risks. They also call for a closer examination of the vertebral arteries during autopsy, to get a “a better estimate of the true incidence of stroke and death secondary to cervical manipulation.”

The warnings made by neurologists may be in the best interest of public education, but chiropractors argue that the incidence of stroke from their practises is being over-represented. In an article by the World Chiropractic Alliance, reference is made to several (uncited) studies that “show conclusively that the risk of stroke from a chiropractic adjustment is so small as to be statistically insignificant.” (4)

As with many issues, more research is needed from both sides. More proof of medical and physiological benefit that can result from neck manipulations needs to be provided by proponents of these types of practises. On the flip side, more concrete evidence of the links between stroke and chiropractic practises is needed as well.

What do you think? Do you visit a chiropractor? Do you feel the benefits outweigh the risks when it comes to neck adjustments? Leave a comment below!

-Adele Courchesne

References:

1. http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/blog/2012/apr/27/chiropractic-manipulation-spine-strokes

2. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12381972?ordinalpos=2&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum

3. http://www.chirobase.org/15News/neurol.html

4. http://www.worldchiropracticalliance.org/media/strokemyth.htm

Advertisements
2 Comments leave one →
  1. Ian permalink
    February 25, 2013 9:52 pm

    The chances of a patient getting a stroke by a cervical adjustment is 1 in 1.5 million. If you compare the risk to other methods for relieving neck pain such as that to the general risk of taking an NSAIDs (1/1000 have a serious GI event) or the risk of surgical complications from neck surgery (7/1000 cause death and 1/125 have neurological complications) it’s a pretty safe tool. This is not to say that strokes have not been cause by manipulation (as rare as it is). It’s usually because of the chiro ignoring signs of a person being at a higher risk for stroke in general which should be screened through a thorough exam. A great article to read if you have not already done so is Cassidy D, Feb 2008 in Spine.

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2271108/pdf/586_2008_Article_634.pdf

  2. July 3, 2013 9:02 pm

    Wow, this paragraph is nice, my younger sister is analyzing these kinds of
    things, therefore I am going to convey her.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: